This legal notice IS HEREBY given

to the public by the Moorish American People of the United States of America Republic:


Notice #0001

Date:  January 19, 2016


We, The People of the United States of America Republic, 
with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, in order to form a more Independent and Perfect government; establish Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice; insure tranquility; Provide for the common defense; Promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America Republic.  As the Law of the Land, We, The People of the Moorish American Society, pledge Our Lives and Property to each other; to gain equal footing in the affairs of men and for other purposes in order to establish justice, promote the health, safety and welfare, secure the Blessings of liberty to Ourselves and Our Posterity do by Our representatives in Convention, ordain and establish the following Constitution Republic form of Government and mutually agree with each other to form Ourselves into a Free and Independent State by the name of: United States of America Republic and we do hereby ratify the boundaries assigned to such State by the Act of Redemption at the Pan American Conference in 1928; the aforesaid which are as follows to wit:  Extends from North-East and South-West Africa across great Atlantis even unto the present North, South and Central America and also into Mexico and the Atlantis Islands; Amexem, Turtle Island, Frog Island.  The fate of the unborn millions will now depend, under the Creator of the Universe, on the conduct of this Sovereign Nation State of Moorish American Nationals and Citizens, Let us, therefore, animate and encourage each other and show the whole world that we as Moorish American Nationals and Citizens are contending for Liberty as Moors on grounds superior to any nation on Earth; We now renew our Covenant with our Creator.


 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Notice #0002

February 4, 2016


Executive Proclamation

Exodus Chapter 5:1

Thus said Ya Elohim of Yisra’El  ‘Let My People go…”


To all Villages, Townships, City Municipalities, State Governments and the Federal Government. To all Judges, Justices and Magistrates. To all Wardens, Watch Commanders and Watchmen. To all County Sheriffs, City Police, State Police, F.B.I. agents, A.T.F. agents, D.E.A. agents, US Marshals and all members of the Law Enforcement Community etc. This Legal Notice hereby places you all on Legal Notice; Lawful Notice is given to the Principal, Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent, Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal. You are hereby Given Notice that all Fiduciaries, Agents, Representatives, Officers and Employees are hereby fired and Terminated on all and any Representation or Responsibility concerning Moorish American People and Citizens of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPUBLIC.


The 13th Amendment of the Constitution abolished slavery. Involuntary servitude shall not be allowed anywhere within the jurisdiction of the United States of America Republic. All forms of slavery therefore are abolished, making voluntary servitude legal.


The 14th Amendment of the UNITED STATES Constitution secured certain rights for the newly freed slaves. 1) It created a citizenship for Negroes. This citizenship was subject to the jurisdiction of the federal government which made them federal wards. 2) It secured the 1st Amendment through the 8th Amendment for Negroes. Henceforth you have two due process clauses in the Constitution of the UNITED STATES, one in the 5th Amendment and one in the 14th Amendment. Therefore the only parts of the UNITED STATES Constitution that apply to the so called Black people/African American people are the 1st Amendment through the 8th Amendments, the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments of the UNITED STATES Constitution. The federal government then gave assumable jurisdiction to the States and to the courts of the States over the newly freed Negroes.


Assumable: 1) To take upon oneself. 2) To pretend to have or to be. 3) To take for granted or true though not proved.


Jurisdiction: 1) A government’s general power to exercise authority over all persons and things within its territory; esp., a State’s power to create interests that will be recognized under common-law principles as valid in other states. 2) A court’s power to decide a case or issue a decree.


The Supreme Court has stated “Jurisdiction is power to declare the Law and when it ceases to exist the only function remaining to the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the cause”. (Ex parte vs. McCardle)


This is not only a Legal Notice; it’s a Claim of Jurisdiction for all Moorish American People and Citizens of the United States of America Republic being of this State all Moorish Nationals Have Unalienable Rights Secured by their Constitution for the United States of America Republic.


Warning: Do not mistake these National Citizens for Black, or African American. Moors are Nationals with Political Rights an Autonomous Sovereign Nation State and are a Part and Parcel of the United States.


We the People for the United States of America Republic are endowed by Our Creator with all unalienable Rights, among which is Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness and that government was instituted among men/women to secure those Rights, not to overthrow those Rights.


Legal Notice has now been given for the record to all quasi government officials and demi-officials upon their own unconstitutional acts of enforcement of “color of Authority.”


Where there is no question that a bench summons, a detention, an arrest, a ticket or citation issued by police officers or by others for parking or traveling with no drivers license, a foreign drivers license, no current registration or no mandatory insurance, or capital, etc., which carries a fine or jail time is a penalty or sanction and is indeed converting a right into a crime, thus violating substantive Rights. It is reasonable to assume that the courts judicial decisions are straight and to the point, and that there’s no lawful method for government to put restrictions or limitations on Rights belonging to the People. The Right to own and possess private property and personality and to be secure in those Rights, is preserved and secured for the People and the Citizens, by the Constitution. The Rights of the People and the Citizens, by their States’ Constitution. Governments do not give rights, for it has no Rights to give, or to sell, nor to license. Government is put in place to protect and secure the pre-existing, unalienable Rights of the People and Citizens.


Wherefore you are authorized by this Executive Proclamation pursuant to National, International as well as Constitutional law to respect the Constitutional immunities of the Moorish American People with all private property rights secured and reserved. You are to enlist all available and appropriate measures to ensure that all substantive Rights and Constitutional Immunities are not abridge, or breached.


The Moorish American People are not to be arrested or held for detention under any circumstances. The Moorish American People and Citizens are exempt from Colorable Laws and are not obligated to, customs, tariffs, taxation, and secured from any other hindrances, or restrictions of their Rights, or freedom of movement within member States, or non member states all available and appropriate measures are to be taken to prevent injustice, harm, or attack on Moorish American Nationals and Citizens, property, freedom and/or dignity.



Rules of Evidence Section 600 et seq.


Presumption and Inference Defined: A Presumption is an assumption of fact that the Law requires to be made from another fact or group of facts found or otherwise established in the action.

(A) Presumption is not Evidence.

(B) An Inference is a deduction of fact that may logically and reasonably be drawn from another part or group of facts found or otherwise establish in an action.


According to the Rules of Evidence it allows one to rebut any Presumptions, so I formally request and demand that the United States government, the governments of the several States, Municipalities and any other governments the opportunity to place on the record any and all Presumptions of Jurisdiction over Moorish Nationals on the record so that our Government has the opportunity to rebut those Presumptions.


The Rules of Evidence also state that the Presumptions only need to be met, in other words, simply meet the Presumption, not defeat it.


The Supreme Court held that conflicting Presumptions must be weighed against each other. (SCOTT v. BURKE; SMELLIE v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO. 212 Cal. 540,299 Pac. 529 (1931)) This case held that a presumption is evidence that must be weighed against conflicting evidence.


The most that should be expected of a party in a civil case is that he prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.


The most that should be expected of the prosecution in a criminal case is that it establishes the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.


Section 600 was derived from Rule 13 of the Uniform Rules of Evidence and supersedes the Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1959.


The Evidence Code classifies all rebuttable Presumptions as either (1) Presumptions affecting the burden of producing evidence essentially (Thayer Presumptions), or (2) Presumptions affecting the burden of proof essentially (Morgan Presumptions).

Section 603


A statute providing that a fact or ground of facts is prima facie evidence of another fact establishes a rebuttable Presumption. A Presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence is a Presumption established to implement no public policy other than to facilitate the determination of the particular action in which the presumption is applied.


It is apparent, this court said in the (Bailey case 219 US 239,31 S.ct 145 151) That a constitutional prohibition cannot be transgressed indirectly by the creation of a statutory presumption any more than it can be violated by a direct enactment. The power to create presumptions is not a means of escape from constitutional restrictions. (Heiner v. Donnan 258 US 312 (1932)


Conclusive Presumptions Affecting Protected Interest


A conclusive presumption may be defeated where its application would impair a party's constitutionally protected Liberty or property interest in such cases, conclusive presumptions have been held to violate a party’s due process and equal protection rights. Vlandis v. Kline (1973) 412 US 441 449,93 Sect 2230,2235; (Cleveland Board of ed. V. Lafleur (1974) 414 US 632 639-640,94 S.ct.1208,1215-Presumption under Illinois Law that unmarried fathers are unfit violates due process) Rutter Group Practice Guide Federal Civil Trials and Evidence,  paragraph 8:4993, page 8k-34.


Then all the people will hear and be afraid, and will not act Presumptuously again. “When you enter the Land which the Almighty Creator gives you, and you possess it and live in it, and you say, I will set a King over me like all the Nations who are around me.”  


You shall surely set a King over you whom your Father the Creator chooses, one from among your countrymen you shall set as King over yourselves; you may not put a Foreigner over yourselves who is not your countryman. (KING JAMES HOLY BIBLE DEUTERONOMY 18:13-15). IN THIS COUNTRY THE STATES ARE THE KINGS, THE PEOPLE AND THE STATE ARE ONE IN THE SAME.




State governments are but Trustees acting under a derived authority (4 wheat 402)


Freedom is enhanced by the creation of two governments not one. (Aldem vs. Maine 527 US 706,755 (1999).


Dissent by Douglas if the Nation comes down from its position of Sovereignty and enters the domain of Commerce it submits to the same Laws that govern individuals therein. It assumes the position of an ordinary Citizen and cannot recede from the fulfillment of its obligations. (COLTEN vs. KENTUCKY (1972) 407 US 104 @ 122, 92 S.Ct. (1953) 74 FED REP. 145, FOLLOWING 91 US 398)


Government descends to the level of mere Private Corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private Citizen. Where private corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. (CLEARFIELD TRUST CO. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363-371 (1942)


If any doubts could exists before the Establishment of the Federal government they should be entirely removed by the 6th Article of the Constitution. A Treaty cannot be the Supreme Law of all the Land if any act of a State Legislature can stand in its way. (WARE vs. HYLTON 3 DALL .199)


When government act in excess of its Lawful Powers, that Liberty is a stone. (Bond vs. United States S.ct. at 10 (2011) “All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights, which duty is a debt owed to its creator, WE THE PEOPLE.” (Wynhammer vs. People, NY 378)




The Court is to Protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally Secured Liberties. (Boyd vs. U.S. 116 US 616)


The Court must obey the Constitution rather than the Law making Departments of government and must on their own Responsibility determine in any particular case if these limits have been passed. (Mugler vs. Kansas, 123 US 623)


Where the Court is without Jurisdiction, it has no authority other than to dismiss the case. (Fontenot vs. State 932 S.W. 2d 185) “Judicial Action without Jurisdiction is void”.-Id (1996).


The Supreme Court has stated: “No Executive, Legislative, or Judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it. (COOPER v. AARON 358 U.S. 1,78 S.Ct.1401 (1958))


The Burden shifts to the Court to prove Jurisdiction. (Rosemond vs. Lambert 469 F2d 416)


Courts that Enforce mere Statutes do not act Judicially, only Ministerially. For they have no Judicial Immunities, unlike a court of Law. They cannot obtain Jurisdiction through Services of Process, Arrest, nor Compelled Appearance. (Bosswell vs. Otis 9 HOW. 336,338)


Therefore Jurisdiction cannot be sustained by a lower court it cannot entertain or decide claims of conflict in Federal Law or State Law. (Hagans vs. Lavine)


No judicial process whatever form it may assume can have any Lawful Authority outside of the limits of the Jurisdiction of the Courts by the judge whom it is issued and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than Lawless Violence. (Ableman vs. Booth 21 Howard 506)


The Supreme Court has held that without proper Jurisdiction a Court cannot proceed at all, but can only note the Jurisdictional Defect and dismiss the cause. (Capron vs. Van Norden 2 Cranch 126,2Led 229)


Therefore the Laws of Congress does not extend into the Territory of the States, but only have force in the District of Columbia or other places under the Exclusive Jurisdiction of the Federal government. (CAHA vs. UNITED STATES 152 US 215)


A court with no Personal Jurisdiction is a court with no power to issue an In Personam judgment. (PENNOYER vs. NEFF 95 US 714, 24 I Ed 565)




Justice Black in his dissenting opinion at page 141 said: “Judges like other people, can be tried, Convicted and Punished for Crimes.” (CHANDLER vs. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE 10TH CIRCUIT 398 US 74, 90 S. Ct 1648,26 L. ed 2d 100.)


Justice Douglas at his dissenting opinion at page 140 said: “If Federal Judges break the Law they can be Prosecuted.” THE JUDICIAL POWERS SHALL EXTEND TO ALL SUITS IN LAW OR EQUITY


It’s well Established that Judges may be Enjoin from Interfering with Citizens Rights. (PIERSON vs. RAY 386 US 547 (1967)


Some defendants urge that any act of a judicial nature entitles the Judge to Judicial Immunity, but in a jurisdictional vacuum that is absence of all Jurisdictions. The second prong necessary to absolute Judicial Immunity is missing a Judge is not Immune for Tortuous acts committed in a purely Administrative Non Judicial capacity. (US vs. ANDERSON 60 F. SUPP. 649 D.C. WASH (1945)


A Judge must be acting within his Jurisdiction as to Subject Matter and Persons, to be entitled to Immunity from Civil Action for his/her acts. (DAVIS vs. BURRIS 51 ARIZ. 220, 75 P. 2d 689 (1938)


A Judge who is aware of a Jurisdiction challenge to his Authority is obliged to raise Sua Sponte (on his own motion) that challenge, even if no litigant raises the challenge or all litigants are prepared to concede the Courts Jurisdiction this means that each Judge in this Court was obliged to inform each current or past criminal defendant and his attorney and appoint him an attorney if he has none and give the Litigants an opportunity to research and argue the Judges lack of Criminal Jurisdiction. (STEEL CO. vs. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIROMENT 523 US. 83 94, 101, 140 L ed 2d 210)


If a Judge acts where he/she has no Jurisdiction to act, the Judge has Engaged in an act, or acts of Treason. (WILL vs. U.S. 449 US 200)


If a Judge act where he/she has no Jurisdiction to act. The Judge has Engaged in an act, or acts of Treason. (COHENS vs. VIRGINIA 19 US. 6 WHEAT)


When acting to enforce a Statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date the Judge of the municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity courts in administering or enforcing Statutes do not act judicially but merely ministerially. (Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 583)




The Police Officer swears by Oath to uphold the United States Constitution as an Officer of Law. Supreme Court Decisions are Considered the Law of the Land in regards to Constitutionally Protected Rights and they cannot be interpreted, or Re-interpreted as they are Stare Decisis they have already been Reviewed and clearly described as Law.


The Supreme Court Ruled those Police Officers could not arrest a Citizen merely for refusing to present identification. (Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352 (1983)


An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so Attempted to be restrained of his Liberty has the same Right to use Force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery. (State v. Robinson 145 ME 77, 72 ATL. 260)


Each Person has the Right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of Force, as in Self-Defense. (State v. Mobley 240 N.C.476, 83 S.E. 2d 100)


One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance. (Adams v. State 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910)




In our Country the people are Sovereign and the government cannot sever its relationship to them by taking away their Citizenship. (PEREZ v. BROWNELL 356 US 44, 7; 8 S.Ct. 568, 2 L Ed 2d 603 (1958))


All American Citizens have Dual Nationality at birth. (KA WAKITA v. UNITED STATES 343 US 717, 96 Led, 1249, 72 S Ct 950)


Indians born within territorial limits of the United States, members of and owing Immediate Allegiance to one of Indian Tribes, although in geographical sense born in United States, are not born in United States, therefore are not born in United States and Subject to Jurisdiction thereof, within meaning of 14th Amendment. (ELK vs. WILKINS 12 US. 94)




Constitutional Rights would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied.  (GOMILLION v. LIGHTFOOT 364 US 155 (1966) SMITH V. ALLWRIGHT 321 US 649,644)


Supreme Court Justice Field, “There is no such thing as a Power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States .... In this Country, Sovereignty resides in the People and Congress can Exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution, Entrusted to it. All else is withheld. (JULIARD V. GREEMAN 110 US 421, 1884)


Where Rights Secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or Legislation which would abrogate them. (MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 384 US 436 (1966) 491, 86 S.Ct. 1603.)


Therefore under rule 12(B) waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences. (BRADY v. US 742 @ 748)


The claim and Exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. (MILLER vs. U.S.)


No one is bound to obey an UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW and no court is bound to Enforce it. (16 AM JUR 2d. 177)


I, Christopher H.-Cannon:Bey, President for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPUBLIC give Legal Lawful Notice to the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches of the UNITED STATES, including the Military and Naval Authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of the Moorish American People and Citizens and will do no Act or Acts to repress the Moorish American People and Citizens, or any of them in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom, or in Organizing themselves for Political, Economical, Social and Cultural Enhancement. The Moorish American People and Citizens are exercising their Rights to Self Determination and have the right to Autonomy, or Self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs as well as ways and means for financing their Autonomous functions.


The United States of America Republic therefore issue this Order to Cease and Desist to all quasi government and government officials alike. The United States of America Republic now grants you 30 days to contact us for the release of all Moorish Nationals and Citizens of the United States of American Republic if you are holding them in custody. Your custody was only a temporary custody these Moorish Nationals and Citizens are Political Hostages and you are to contact the United States of America Republic to negotiate the full release of these Detainees.


Any Moorish American or Citizen being held in violation of a Capitol Crime shall not be released until the completion of their sentence. The United States of America Republic reserves the right to investigate all cases involving Capitol Crimes in which a Moorish National, or Citizen are being held in custody for such an offence.


THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPUBLIC enforces International Law, the Laws of Nations, Constitutional Law and Human Rights and the Rights of Indigenous People in North America in which the Trafficking of Human Chattel is a Serious Crime. You will no longer act under Presumption, or Colorable Laws against Moorish American People and Citizens. The Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations and Customs only apply and are only binding on your citizens or Residents. You have now been given Legal Notice: That this day October 26, 2015, there are no more Presumptions. The Moorish American People have been claimed by their Lawful State and government. Moorish Nationals are under the Exclusive Jurisdiction of the United States of America Republic. The United States of America Republic is the National government, not to be confused with the Federal government. The United States of America Republic is A Part and Parcel of the United States.


The Moorish American People have a Valid and Existing Treaty with the United States. The Supreme Court has stated “The Treaty is the Supreme Law of the Land it Nullifies all Codes, Statutes and Ordinances” (Edye vs. Robertson (112 US 580).


No man in this Country is so high he is above the law and no Officer of the Law can set that Law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. (US vs. Lee 106 US. 196)


Therefore any violation of the Secured Rights of Moorish American People and Citizens, by any governmental corporations, or their agents, or employees would be an Illegal and Unlawful entry outside the Jurisdictional Boundaries of such corporation’s authority which in Law is considered a Trespass. This matter is now Ultra Vires.


Trespassing on a Fee Simple Absolute Estate is a serious offence you and your agents and or employees; “Indeed, no more than an Affidavit is necessary to make prima facie case.” (UNITED STATES v. Kis 658 F. 3d 526)


Statements in affidavits that are not rebutted by opposing party’s affidavit or pleadings may be accepted as true by the trial court. (Winsett v. Donaldson (Mich 1976) 244 N.W. 2d 355)


Silence is Acquiescence - is related doctrine that can mean and have the legal effect, that when confronted with a wrong or an act that can be considered a tortuous act, where one’s silence may mean that one accepts or permits such acts without protest or claim thereby losses rights to a claim of any loss or damages.


The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim. The doctrine is similar to, and often applied with, estoppel by laches.


This occurred in the second Georgia v. South Carolina case before the U.S. Supreme court in 1992, when it was ruled that Georgia could no longer make any claim to an island in the Savannah River, despite the 1787 Treaty of Beaufort’s assignment to the contrary. The court said that the state had knowingly allowed South Carolina to join the island as a peninsula to its own coast by dumping sand from dredging and to then levy property taxes on it for decades. Georgia thereby lost the island-turned-peninsula by its own acquiescence, even though the treaty had given it all of the islands in the river.


Equal Protection under the Law - The equal protection of the laws of a state is extended to persons within its jurisdiction, within the meaning of the constitutional requirement, when its courts are open to them on the same conditions as to others, with likes rules of evidence and modes of procedure, for the security of their persons and property, the prevention and redress of wrongs, and the enforcement of contracts, Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition p. 631, EI Souri v. Dept of Social Services, 429 Mich 203, 207,; 4141 N.W. 2d. 679 (1987).


ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT - A federal statute establishing practices and procedures to be followed in rule making and adjudication. The act was designed to give citizens basic due -process protection such as the right to prevent evidence and to be heard by an independent hearing officer. Z, A similar state statute.


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - The law governing the organization and operation of the executive branch of government (including independent agencies) and the relation of the executive, with the legislature, the judiciary and the public.


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - The doctrine that, if an administrative remedy is provided by statute, relief must be sought from administrative body and such remedy be exhausted before courts will act. Abelleria v. District Court of App. Third Dist. 17 Cal2d 280,109 P. 2d 942, 949, 132A.L.R. 715; Hills v. Brisbane, 66, Cal App. 2d 15,151 P. 2d 578, 582.


REMEDY - The means by which a right is enforced or the violation of right is prevented, redressed, or compensated.


RIGHT OF ACTION - The present right to commence and maintain an action at law to enforce the payment or collection of a debt or demand see Hibbard v. Clark 56 N.H. 155, 22 Am Rep. 432, 435.


NOTICE - Is a legal pronouncement of a pleading contract; about to be implemented, should the party receiving the notice fail to answer and rebut the notice point for point.


FAULT OF OMISSION - Negligence resulting from a NEGATIVE ACT.


DEFAULT - The omission or failure to perform a legal or contractual duty.

Failure of party to take step required of him in progress of a cause: or fails to appear on the trail, he is said to make default. McCabe v. Tom 35 Ohio App. 73, 17 N.E. Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition.


ACQUIESCENCE: Equivalent to assent inferred from silence with knowledge or from encouragement and presupposes knowledge. Andrew v. Rivers 207 Iowa 343,223 N.W. 102 105. Imports tacit consent, concurrence, acceptance or assent. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles, Cal App. 132 P. 2d 553, 563. A silent appearance of consent. Failure to make any objections. Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition.


TACIT PROCURATION: - Is an action authorized by implied agreement by remaining silent; i.e. “tacit procuration takes place when an individual sees another managing his affairs and does not interfere to prevent it.” Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition


AGREEMENT: The consent of two or more persons concurring respecting the transmission of some property right, or benefits, with the view of contracting an obligation, a mutual obligation. Bac Abr.; Rocha v. Hulen 6 Cal App, 2d 245,


Consent: A concurrence of wills. Voluntary yielding the will to the proposition of another; acquiescence or compliance therewith. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co., D.C. Minn., 26 fed. Sup. 366, 371.


Agreement: The act or result of coming into harmony or accord. Glantz v. Gabel, 66 Mont. 134,212 P. 858, 860.


Judgment by Default: Is a judgment rendered in consequence of the non-appearance of the defendant, Bread v. Sovereign Lodge. W.O.W., 184 N.C.154, 113 s.e. 661;In re Smith, 28 Idaho 746 225 P. 495; Brame v. Nolen,139 Va. 413,124 S.E. 299,301. The term is also applied to judgments entered under statues or rules of court, for want of affidavit of defense, plea, answer and the like or failure to take some required step in the cause. Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition.


Consent judgment: A judgment, the provision and terms of which are settled and agreed to by the parties to the action. Hargis v. Hargis, 252 Ky.198.66 S.W. 2d 59; Andrews v. Indemnity Ins, Co. of North America, 55 R.I. 341,181. A. 403.


Consent judgments: are, in effect, merely contracts acknowledge in open court and ordered to be recorded, but as such they bind the parties as fully as do other judgment. Price v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co., Tex Civ. App., 250 S.W. 785, 789 Belcher v. Cobb, 169 N.C. 689, 86 S.E. 600, 602


Obligation: The binding power of a vow, promise, oath, or contract, or of law, civil, political, or moral, independent of a promise: That which constitutes a legal or moral duty and which renders a person liable to coercion and punishment for neglecting it. An obligation, or debt, may exist by reason of a judgment as well as an express contract, in either case there being a legal duty on the part of the one bound to comply with promise. Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition.


Contract: A promissory agreement between two or more person that creates, modifies, or destroys legal relation. Buffalo Press Steele Co. v. Kirwan, 138 Md. 60, 113 A628, 630: Mexican Petroleum Corp. of Louisiana v. North German Lloyd, D.C. La., 17 F. 2”d 113, 114. Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition.  



To be arrested for any violation, or violations of International Law(s) and to appear before the Supreme Court for the United States of America Republic, or an International Criminal Court at any time you have violated the Constitution for the United States of America Republic, or at any time you or your agents have not acted in good faith.



That any violation of the Constitutional Secured Rights of Moorish American people is a Trespass.



To pay a compensation fine of $ 5,000,000 to $ 5,000,000,000 dollars per violation of the Rights of Moorish American people Secured by their Constitution, or for violations of International Law(s).



Trespassers will be prosecuted, trespass of any kind is punishable by a compensation fine of $5,000,000 - $5,000,000,000 dollars and or imprisonment redressable by an action for damages.


Penalties for trespass of Property includes but is not limited to:

1.  It includes any wrongful act;

2. Any infringement, or transgression of the rule of right Any legal wrong in which the appropriate remedy was not given;

3. Any direct forcible injury to person, land, or chattels;

4. Any unlawful act committed against the person or property of another, wrongful entry on another’s real property;

5. In tort law a land owner owe no duty to unforeseeable trespassers;

6. Title Estoppel apply;

7. Any violations of the Rights of Indigenous People, The Vienna Declaration and programme of action; or

8. The Organic Constitution of The United States of America Republic.



You and your agents and co-parties are committing scienter acts (omitting knowledge) in bad faith, fraud, conspiracy, undue Enrichment, aiding and abetting, willful and wanton conduct, irreparable harm, with malice and forethought, conversion, commercial war, commercial credit slander and continuous torts.



Any immunity, whether absolute or limited are not protective in their acts of bad faith against Moorish American people and Citizens and that AM JUR 2ND VOLUME 1 & (a) CLAUSE #298 applies. NO IMMUNITIES WILL PROTECT A PERSON WHO ACTS IN BAD FAITH



Any Collateral attack on this agreement/contract is bad faith and is an attempt to violate U.S. Constitution Article 1, Sec.10 “The Impairment of Contracts” and the D.C. Codes.



That you have never disclosed the hidden nature and cause and conditions of the contracts in commerce that were executed on the Moorish American Detainees being held in your prisons.




That if additional time is needed to respond, such request must be done in writing and must be received by the United States of America Republic within the ten (10) days allotted to request additional time or be forever barred from contest under the doctrine of maxim of collateral Estoppel 5 USC §706.



That all Bonds, Notes and Securities, Miller Act Bonds, Bid Bonds, Performance Bonds, Restitution and Payments Related to any and all Cases and Judgments Involved with Moorish Americans, or Citizens are now and hereby forever Claimed as Collateral and property of the United States of America Republic for want of Consideration.



THAT THE Moorish American Citizens being held by your prisons have never been told or made aware that the charges and penalties are based on their voluntary act to contract and agree that all such contracts are void due to their hidden nature and lack of disclosure.


You are now granted thirty (30) days, exclusive of the day of receipt to respond to the statements, claims and inquiries above. Failure to respond will constitute by operation of Law the admission of all involved by tacit procuration to the statements, claims and answers to inquires shall be deemed res judicata, stare decisis. Failure to respond will constitute promissory Estoppel and collateral estoppel, equitable Estoppel, Title Estoppel and Estoppel by Acquiescence. This is a perfected contract and it is a statute staple, UCC Confirmatory writing.


All United States and government officials are hereby placed on Legal Notice that I expect them to have recorded valid oaths of office in accordance with U.S. Constitution;


Article VI: The Senators and Representative before mentioned, and the members of the Several State Legislators and all Executives and Judicial officers, both of the United States and of the Several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution.


I Overstand that by their oaths of office all U.S. government and State government officials are contractually bound by the U.S. Constitution as formulated by its framers, and not as “Interpreted”, Subverted, or corrupted by various government officials.


I further Overstand, that any Laws, Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations, Rules and Procedures contrary to the U.S. Constitution as written by its framers, are null and void, as expressed in the Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the Law of the Land and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statutes not been enacted.”


Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it.


A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental Law of the Land, it is superseded thereby.




  1. That nothing in the Constitution runs, or is counter-productive to the Constitution of the UNITED STATES.



  1. That this constitution of the Moorish American People is not a Declaration of Expatriation of their American Citizenship as true American Citizens bound to the American Continent, and is a Declaration of their Independence as an Independent Nation State on American soil.



  1. This Divine Constitution of the Moorish American People is in fact an Organic Constitution made between the Moorish American People and their Creator. It is a Social Contract.



  1. That the Moorish American People, being Indigenous Aboriginal People to the Americas have now reestablished the United States Of America Republic as their government and the Dejure government of North America, and that they are the Hebrew People and have been living on the American Continent since 600 B.C.



  1. That the Moorish American People are a friendly Foreign Domestic Sovereign Nation State and ally of the United States, with ties to the International community with a Peace Treaty active and in full force with the United States.



  1. That they will uphold the Emancipation Proclamations, that the Executive Branch, the Military and Navy shall defend them in all their efforts for their actual freedom and to help maintain such freedom.



  1. That the Moorish American People are not part of, or active in any Terrorist Organization or Acts.



  1. To all statements in this Executive Proclamation, and admit to all claims made by Tacit Procuration by simply remaining silent, Estoppel by Acquiescence, all issues are deemed settled res judicata, stare decisis and Collateral Estoppel apply.



  1. Any collateral attack on this Agreement/Contract is bad faith and is an attempt to violate U.S. Constitution Article 1 Sec 10 “The Impairment of Contracts” and the D.C. Codes.



  1.  If a request for additional time to respond is needed, such request must be received by President Christopher H.-Cannon:Bey as provided in this notice only in the thirty (30) days allotted or be forever barred from contest under the doctrine or maxim of collateral Estoppel 5 USC §706.


President Christopher H.-Cannon:Bey, grants the EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL BRANCHES of the UNITED STATES thirty (30) days exclusive of the day of receipt to respond to the statements, claims and inquiries above. Failure to respond will constitute as an operation of law the admission of the EXECUTIVE, LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL BRANCHES by tacit procuration to the statements and claims and answers to inquiries shall be deemed res judicata, stare decisis. Failure to respond will constitute Promissory Estoppel, Title Estoppel, and Estoppel by Acquiescence.


This is a perfected contract and it is a Statute Staple, UCC confirmatory writing.


LEGAL NOTICE: That any violations of all United States government and State government officials’ contractual obligations to act in accordance with their U.S. Constitution, may result in Prosecution to the full extent of the law, as well as the application of all available legal remedies to recover damages suffered by any parties damaged by any actions of U.S. and State government officials in violation of the United States of America Republic Constitution.


Procedures and deadlines for objections to approval of this Executive Proclamation


The deadline to serve and file Legal Notice and Objections and or responses to this Legal Notice must be in writing pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 17(b), a failure to deny these facts within thirty (30) days of receiving this petition constitute an affirmative admission of their validity and truthfulness.


26 USC 6065 requires that denials must be signed under penalty of perjury by those denying, and that the person denying must have knowledge of facts indicated. Objections must state the name and address of the party asserting the objections or party proposing an objection to this Legal Notice. Objections must disclose statement and the amount of the parties claim or the nature of its interest in Moorish American Citizens. Specify the basis and nature of any objections and set forth any evidences supporting claim. Objections are to be mailed by USPS Registered Mail to: Christopher H.-Cannon:Bey, President of the United States of America Republic (USAR), 3336 West 164th Street, Markham Illinois [60428].


Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal, or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. (UNITED STATES v. Horton R. Prudden, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS.


In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my name, and caused the seal of the United States of America Republic to be affixed. I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind, and the gracious favor of the Creator of the Universe.

Done at the City of New Mecca this Twenty-Sixth day of October, 2015, and of the Independence of the United States of America Republic.



By: Christopher H-Cannon:Bey,